We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Top Stories
Why it matters: The strongest capability signal is now sustained agent work under disclosed conditions, not a model label alone.
Autonomous research is measurable, but novelty remains scarce. Prime Intellect reports 100+ autonomous runs across 10+ models on 8×H200s for up to eight days; the best runs closed 82% of the gap to a human-built nanoGPT optimizer record. Elie Bakouch calls the experiment noisy (~50-step spread after 24 hours), says Fable 5 reached the 82% mark, and highlights Kimi K3 building an experiment API. The team’s own surprise—deep understanding but few genuinely new ideas—makes this a sustained-optimization signal, not yet evidence of open-ended scientific creativity.
DeepSeek V4 Pro’s score is a harness result in this test. A community report says the same release scored 91 in DSH Standard but 99/96 in DSH Minimal and 98/99 in Anchored Standard on a frozen Project2 V4.1b test, matching Sol, Fable, and Opus’s top band. Minimal reproduces the RL-time prompt with bash and str_replace_editor; Anchored Standard restores 25 tools after the first call without returning to 91. The report notes DeepSeek’s model card specifies Minimal for public code-agent benchmarks, while default users still often see 91—making prompt, tool schema, and harness disclosure essential.
Research & Innovation
Why it matters: Reliability gains may come from better tests and agent interfaces, not only larger checkpoints.
BenchDrift generates meaning-preserving benchmark variants. Across eight models on GSM8K, MMLU, and MATH-Hard, phrasing sensitivity persists: stronger models lose more from rephrasing than they gain, and confident answers can break even when only wording length changes.
StateBridge passes the last 64-token hidden states directly into a receiving model’s embedding space without retraining. It beat or tied baselines on 22/26 tests and raised Qwen3-32B GPQA from 58.3% with text to 64.1%; testing used identical weights, and the less-visible channel is harder to debug and govern.
ArchAgent v2 uses cascaded evolution and hardware-budget feedback to find a three-level prefetcher that beat the prior hand-designed champion by 0.3% geometric-mean IPC; multi-core search remains bottlenecked by simulation latency.
Products & Launches
Why it matters: Agent products are making orchestration and browsing behaviors user-facing runtime features.
Multi-agents v2 now lets a model delegate to any supported model, including Luna—an explicit model-agnostic delegation layer.
Yutori Navigator runs screenshot-action loops; Together AI says it beats frontier performance at twice the inference speed and 4–5× lower cost.
Industry Moves
Why it matters: Commercial concentration, talent retention, and memory access are becoming strategic AI variables.
OpenAI’s commercial center is turning enterprise. Kimmonismus, citing the Financial Times, reports that a 60/40 consumer-enterprise revenue split at the start of the year has crossed to majority enterprise. Separately, the account reports GPU-systems engineer Scott Gray’s departure and at least 12 senior-leader exits in 2026; the two signals should not be treated as causal.
Memory supply is becoming a geopolitical AI constraint. A WSJ-cited post says the Trump administration is pressing Apple over CXMT/YMTC memory chips for devices sold in China; standard parts are legal, while sharing information for customized chips requires a U.S. license.
Policy & Regulation
Why it matters: Frontier labs are arguing for differentiated oversight rather than uniform rules.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei calls regulation-versus-distribution a false choice. He supports stronger testing for frontier than off-frontier models, exemptions for smaller firms (citing $500M for California’s SB53), pre-deployment testing for frontier and open-weight models approaching the frontier, and a FINRA-like entity. These are Anthropic’s policy positions, not enacted changes.
Quick Takes
Why it matters: Smaller signals point to cheaper inference, wider adoption, and open-model reach.
- Pranjal reports a from-scratch Blackwell NVFP4 matmul beating cuBLAS by 4.7% at N=8192.
- Doximity’s survey of 3,151 U.S. physicians says 63% use AI; 75% of AI users report lower administrative burden and better job satisfaction.
- Bloomberg, cited by @business, reports Alibaba’s open-weight models exceeded 3 billion global downloads in six months.
- DeepSeek Harness reached 120K GitHub stars in 4 days; @teortaxesTex says most are "dead" and reads the effort as a talent-recruiting gambit for "99.999th percentile" engineers rather than a user play .
- DeepSeek hired Cui Tianyi in March 2026 to lead the Harness team; he wrote "Nine Lectures on Backpack Problem" (2007), spent ~9 years at Jane Street on software/quant research, and co-founded quant firm TSY Capital in 2022 .
- Harness's design centers on "Everything is a plugin" and "Every run is traceable"; its Cordis layer studies how to undo component side effects, applying quantitative-trading rigor to agent execution .
- DeepSeek V4-Preview launched in April 2026; the same analyst frames V4 as a "philosophically radical AGI project" with deterministic, bitwise-batch-invariant, training-inference-aligned rollouts across hundreds of thousands of sandboxes .
- The same account adds that DSH is "a highly leveraged bet" and notes Fable's skepticism .
Sam Altman said within the next six months a descendant of ChatGPT could "continuously watch your screen," meetings, and calls while maintaining full context of your life and work; he says it is only "one model generation away" from being "incredibly useful" and estimates timing at "sometime in the next six months" . Commentator @ChrisGPT notes Altman didn't call it GPT-6 or an Astra model, framing it as a clear AGI signal—a persistent multimodal agent that catches mistakes and proactively offers to work . Counterpoint from @zachtratar: this is already possible today, citing Notion AI meeting notes and KimiK3 for screen-data/agentic workflows .
Pranjal (@pranjalssh) published the sequel to his H100 blog, implementing Blackwell matmul for NVFP4 from scratch and outperforming cuBLAS by 4.7% at N=8192, with a method that exact-fits Nvidia hardware better than Hilbert curves. Full details: https://cudaforfun.substack.com/p/outperforming-cublas-on-nvfp4
- Anthropic is rapidly ramping up AI efforts in biology and medicine, with Dario Amodei expecting "incredible results in the coming years and some early glimmers in the coming months," and promising the company will announce real accomplishments "as loudly as possible" once achieved .
- Responding to criticism that his AI messaging is disproportionately negative, Amodei argues the public's negative view of AI is "fundamentally a crisis of trust" in companies and governments, and that winning trust back requires actually delivering results — "actually curing cancer" — not a glitzy positive marketing campaign .
- Amodei defends his messaging as balanced between risks and benefits, citing his essay "Machines of Loving Grace" (arguing AI could cure most human disease in ~5-10 years) and his recent "Policy on the AI Exponential" (proposing streamlined FDA processes so AI-accelerated drugs aren't slowed by regulation) .
Levie argues Cursor executed the applied AI strategy flawlessly, noting the biggest developer tool exits in history were on the order of low billions of dollars and most underestimated the market size in AI coding . Agentic coding's market is far larger than most realized, with ample room to innovate between the user and the underlying model, and even on the model itself . He outlines Cursor's applied AI playbook: figuring out the right product shape for agentic coding, acting as a neutral layer between models and workflows, post-training models to drive down costs or improve performance, building the right infrastructure stack, and developing a category-aligned go-to-market motion . He expects to see many more applied AI successes like this .
New Qwen 3.8 27B dense model is compute-heavier than DeepSeek V4 Flash (284B total, 19B active) and comparable to MiniMax M3 (427B, 26B active), while far smaller than Kimi K3 (2.8T, 104B active), DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.6T, 49B active), and GLM 5.2 (743B, 39B active); it runs on consumer hardware. Commentary adds it was likely pretrained with higher MFU than DeepSeek V4 Flash, making both about equally costly in GPU-hours per 1T training tokens, and calls for more published training-efficiency figures.
A tweet from @AnziParazzi cites Anthropic as explicitly saying it does not have RSI internally, with AI assistance accelerating its AI R&D by less than 2x . AI commentator @teortaxesTex rejects this as a bad-faith definitional quibble, arguing Anthropic has thousands of GPUs per researcher, no longer faces bottlenecks like kernel engineering, and has models that autonomously prove hard theorems and design experiments — calling this 'RSI' — and adds that >2x acceleration has been achieved with commercial models for over six months, suggesting Anthropic crossed its 'responsible scaling' red lines .
@teortaxesTex says a test/tool confirms Flash-0731 is "overfit to a harness" and doesn't optimally self-steer by default ; a reply shares the GitHub tool SheberDavid/v4-flash-godmode-opencode-go as useful for this . He also praises the speed and quality of DS's free web/app, adding: "They don't raise prices because they're out of money."
- Turing Post profiles Simile AI, the startup built on Stanford's Generative Agents research, describing it as a "$2B bet" on simulating human behavior at scale and asking whether simulations can justify $100M runs .
- Simile's lineage comes from Joon Sung Park's Stanford work: 2022's Social Simulacra populated hypothetical online communities with thousands of generated personas (with Percy Liang and Michael Bernstein among co-authors), and 2023's "Smallville" placed 25 AI agents in a pixelated town where they accumulated memories, adjusted plans, and maintained relationships over simulated days .
- In 2025, Park and collaborators created agents modeled on 1,052 Americans from two-hour interviews and survey data, then tested them on General Social Survey questions, personality measures, economic games, and replicated social-science experiments against a demographics-only baseline .
- The SocSci210 dataset contains 2.9M individual responses from 400,491 participants across 210 social-science experiments; fine-tuning a 14B-parameter Qwen model on it improved agreement with human distributions on unseen studies by 26% relative.
- Demand came from both social scientists wanting to run experiments and large-company executives wanting answers about customers and markets, which pushed Park to start the company with Liang and Bernstein; inbound interest arrived about six months after the Generative Agents paper .
Krea AI's realtime image editing lets users screenshare Pinterest-style content and edit images instantly ; the same workflow works on Krea's discovery page to riff off other people's generations .
AI researcher @yilin_yang721 observes that a large part of the industry is now driven by evals, with many modeling efforts pursuing state-of-the-art eval scores as their primary goal, crediting eval teams like artificial analysis and SWE-bench . AI researcher @OfirPress amplifies this, calling evals "(almost) all you need" .
Dario Amodei (Anthropic CEO) argued that AI structurally concentrates power due to scaling laws, not regulation, and that open-weights models are insufficient because compute and chips remain concentrated in frontier labs and hardware providers . He rejected the "regulation = regulatory capture = concentration" framing, advocating "rules of the road" that simultaneously address cyber/bio/alignment risks, institutionally constrain frontier companies, and leave room for open-weights . He detailed Anthropic's policy proposals as deliberately disadvantaging frontier labs: SB53 exempts companies under $500M in revenue/training costs (SB1047 had a lower threshold that Anthropic objected to); CAISI/White House testing is more rigorous for frontier vs off-frontier models; and the "Pacing the Frontier" approach would slow only the best models . He voiced support for the reported Trump administration plan of pre-deployment testing for frontier models and testing open-weights models as they approach the frontier, pending details, and endorsed Demis Hassabis' idea of a FINRA-like regulatory entity .
Yutori's browser-use agents run iterative screenshot-action loops, dozens of times per task; its Navigator model running on Together AI reportedly beats frontier performance with 2x faster inference and 4-5x lower cost .
In a tweet, @theo finds it "kinda wild" that Dario is blaming social media algorithms for damaging public reputation of their text generation algorithms.
@boneGPT argues international cooperation on AI was always "a childish pipedream" with "zero examples of countries willingly halting research on the most strategic technology of their time because of a treaty"; only nuclear treaties and the ozone ban ever worked, and unlike nukes — never a trillion-dollar, work-replacing technology — "you can't make a nuke code an app" . Predicting "a great war," he attacks "Dean" (linking to @deanwball's post) for refusing to build robots to fight it while invoking children he plans to send off to die to maintain a monopoly "for the supposed good guys" . @teortaxesTex endorses the "total war" implication as "the endpoint of the Jevons paradox": higher AI productivity means not abundance but "SPEED OF METABOLIZING THE WORLD" .
In a discussion on AI compute and regulation, GavinSBaker argues the compute shortage plus high DRAM prices (which reduce compute per capex dollar) may be "civilizationally useful" by giving time to adapt to a possible fast takeoff . He also contends that because humans run on only 15-20 watts, they will remain economically useful even in a fast-takeoff, AGI-maximalist scenario while compute remains constrained . He predicts compute inequality will become as massive an issue as income inequality, but argues for growing the pie so even the bottom of the distribution is better off, adding "Tokens per intelligence density per token per watt for the win - hopefully America wins that race" . He also frames cyber as defense dominant and bio as offense dominant, calling the bio point the best pro-regulation argument and backing the USG having all necessary information . @theo highlighted the 15-20 watts quote from GavinSBaker's reply .
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei said the thing that will change the public's perception of AI is "actually curing cancer," adding that Anthropic is ramping up its efforts in biology and medicine . Analyst @teortaxesTex argues that although biology has so far been more resistant to scaling + RLVR than software engineering and Google has a wealth of research, Dario "has a good shot" at the lead after the GDM implosion .
AI watermarking will likely be circumvented by tools and APIs that strip watermarks, making the measure create friction rather than real visibility, per @HamelHusain .
- DHH promoted Omarchy as "the infinitely malleable computer" that "can make it happen" for anything you can think of , linking to a post on the project .
- @matvelloso, first encountering Omarchy, called it "maybe the first 'AI-first' OS out there," ahead of any mainstream OS .
Prime Intellect's Prime Agent ran OpenAI GPT-5.6 Sol and Claude Opus 5 on the NanoGPT speedrun; these runs were excluded from the main plot as not the best but are available in the traces view . Scores were "within noise," per @eliebakouch, and the blog includes more Prime Agent examples with other models . Trace links: Sol and Opus 5.
𝕏 post by @DarioAmodei
1/2 Thanks Gavin for an especially thoughtful exchange. I don’t usually spend much time on social media but I wanted to engage here because it really brings out the heart of an important conversation.
First, on regulation, I think that “either concentrate it in the hands of a chosen few companies and politicians via regulation or distribute it widely” is a false choice. I know that there’s a sort of Silicon Valley shorthand where regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power, but I’ve always found this to be an overly simplified picture of the world. Many people outside this bubble think of regulation as something that constrains corporate power and benefits ordinary people. I don’t necessarily agree with that perspective either, rather I think it’s complicated and really depends on what the “regulation” consists of. But in particular I think that those in the “regulation = regulatory capture = concentration of power” frame often underrate the decentralizing power of objective and fair institutional processes. A crude analogy is that the formal court system can sometimes feel stuffy and elitist, but it does a much better job of defending the rights of vulnerable individuals than the alternative, mob justice. At their best, institutions can vest power in ideas rather than people, and thereby decentralize that power.
This is why Anthropic has always made its policy proposals very carefully. We try very hard to make proposals that disadvantage (slow down) frontier AI companies while *advantaging* smaller competitors. California’s SB53 (which we supported), and even the much-maligned SB 1047 (which we were ambivalent on), completely exempt any company below a certain amount of revenue or model training costs from being covered at all (it was $500M for SB 53, lower for 1047 but we objected to that). More recently the testing process we’ve advocated for at CAISI and the White House involves more rigorous tests for frontier models than off-frontier models — something that differentially advantages challengers. Similarly, the “Pacing the Frontier” letter envisions (or at least Anthropic’s preferred implementation of it envisions) modulating the pace of the very best models while not constraining those who are catching up. This hurts the business interests of the frontier labs and helps challengers, including open-weights!
Overall my view is that AI is *structurally* a technology that tends to concentrate power, for reasons that have nothing to do with regulation (more to do with the extreme implications of the scaling laws). Open-weights do help some with this but are nowhere near a sufficient solution because they simply shift the concentration somewhat to those with the most compute and chips (which are roughly the frontier labs plus maybe hardware providers). By contrast I think the right “rules of the road” can simultaneously (a) address AI’s cyber/bio/alignment risks, (b) institutionally constrain the power of the frontier AI companies, and (c) leave room for open-weights models while also addressing the specific risks that they bring.
BTW I do not think that the events of the last few months have “failed to result in [my] preferred regulatory path”. The approach that the Trump administration is reported to be taking — pre-deployment testing for frontier models, and also testing of open-weights models when they get closer to the frontier — is one that I am very supportive of, though of course I have to see the details to be sure. I am also supportive of Demis Hassabis’ ideas around a FINRA-like entity. This contrasts with six months ago when most of the industry was still pushing for preemption of all state regulation and no apparent federal approach either.
https://x.com/gavinsbaker/status/2088611616577253502 (opens in new tab)
2/2 Second, on the messaging around AI. I do not agree that my messaging has been disproportionately negative. In fact it has been about equally balanced between risks and benefits: I’ve written one major essay about each, and even in interviews where I discuss the risks, I make sure to frequently mention the incredible benefits as well as proposing possible solutions to the risks (short clips from my interviews that end up on social media tend to be disproportionately negative, as that gets clicks). In fact, I wrote Machines of Loving Grace because I didn’t feel the AI industry was painting an inspiring enough picture of how the technology could radically transform the world for the better. The bulk of the essay is devoted to refuting skepticism of AI’s potential in health and biology, and showing why I think it will actually be possible to cure most human disease in \~5-10 years, as crazy as it may sound to ordinary people and frankly to biologists as well (I used to be one!). And, if you read my most recent essay (Policy on the AI Exponential), I discuss concrete proposals for how to streamline the FDA process to make sure the deluge of AI-accelerated drugs isn’t slowed down by the regulatory process. I feel the urgency here: I lost my father to Hepatitis C only a few years before the development of direct-acting antivirals (sofosbuvir), which cure 95% of patients and probably would have cured him.
I do agree that the public has a negative view of AI (and that this is a big problem), but I don’t think it is primarily caused by me or any other AI leader warning about AI’s risks. I think it is fundamentally a crisis of trust. I think that ordinary people don’t trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over. The causes of this go back decades and AI is just the latest iteration of it. I don’t think that a glitzy marketing campaign with a positive spin (which some have advocated that Anthropic do) is the way to win back that trust — at this point, saying that AI will cure cancer is more a cliche than it is inspiring, and most people think it is deceptive. The thing that will work is *actually curing cancer*. I think by far the most accurate criticism of AI companies including Anthropic is that we haven’t yet delivered on our big promises to benefit the world. That is totally on us, and I think it’s the criticism you should be making, instead of all this stuff about messaging and marketing.
We are however doing our best to fix this: Anthropic is ramping up its efforts very quickly in biology and medicine, and we hope to have incredible results in the coming years and some early glimmers in the coming months. When we’ve actually accomplished something real, the whole world will hear about it, as loudly as possible, you have my word on that. But until then I don’t want to make empty promises, and in the meantime I feel compelled to speak honestly about the very real risks of AI and how to address them. Honesty is the right thing on the merits, and in terms of public credibility and trust it is no worse than, and may in fact be better than, an approach that ignores or distracts from risks which people instinctively understand are real.
- Anthropic is rapidly ramping up AI efforts in biology and medicine, with Dario Amodei expecting "incredible results in the coming years and some early glimmers in the coming months," and promising the company will announce real accomplishments "as loudly as possible" once achieved .
- Responding to criticism that his AI messaging is disproportionately negative, Amodei argues the public's negative view of AI is "fundamentally a crisis of trust" in companies and governments, and that winning trust back requires actually delivering results — "actually curing cancer" — not a glitzy positive marketing campaign .
- Amodei defends his messaging as balanced between risks and benefits, citing his essay "Machines of Loving Grace" (arguing AI could cure most human disease in ~5-10 years) and his recent "Policy on the AI Exponential" (proposing streamlined FDA processes so AI-accelerated drugs aren't slowed by regulation) .