Your intelligence agent for what matters

Tell ZeroNoise what you want to stay on top of. It finds the right sources, follows them continuously, and sends you a cited daily or weekly brief.

Set up your agent
What should this agent keep you on top of?
Discovering sources...
Syncing sources 0/180...
Extracting information
Generating brief

Your time, back

An AI curator that monitors the web nonstop, lets you control every source and setting, and delivers verified daily or weekly briefs.

Save hours

AI monitors connected sources 24/7—YouTube, X, Substack, Reddit, RSS, people's appearances and more—condensing everything into one daily brief.

Full control over the agent

Add/remove sources. Set your agent's focus and style. Auto-embed clips from full episodes and videos. Control exactly how briefs are built.

Verify every claim

Citations link to the original source and the exact span.

Discover sources on autopilot

Your agent discovers relevant channels and profiles based on your goals. You get to decide what to keep.

Multi-media sources

Track YouTube channels, Podcasts, X accounts, Substack, Reddit, and Blogs. Plus, follow people across platforms to catch their appearances.

Private or Public

Create private agents for yourself, publish public ones, and subscribe to agents from others.

3 steps to your first brief

1

Describe your goal

Tell your AI agent what you want to track using natural language. Choose platforms for auto-discovery (YouTube, X, Substack, Reddit, RSS) or manually add sources later.

Weekly report on space exploration and electric vehicle innovations
Daily newsletter on AI news and research
Startup funding digest with key venture capital trends
Weekly digest on longevity, health optimization, and wellness breakthroughs
Auto-discover sources

2

Review and launch

Your agent finds relevant channels and profiles based on your instructions. Review suggestions, keep what fits, remove what doesn't, add your own. Launch when ready—you can always adjust sources anytime.

Discovering sources...
Sam Altman Profile

Sam Altman

Profile
3Blue1Brown Avatar

3Blue1Brown

Channel
Paul Graham Avatar

Paul Graham

Account
Example Substack Avatar

The Pragmatic Engineer

Newsletter
Reddit Machine Learning

r/MachineLearning

Community
Naval Ravikant Profile

Naval Ravikant

Profile
Example X List

AI High Signal

List
Example RSS Feed

Stratechery

RSS
Sam Altman Profile

Sam Altman

Profile
3Blue1Brown Avatar

3Blue1Brown

Channel
Paul Graham Avatar

Paul Graham

Account
Example Substack Avatar

The Pragmatic Engineer

Newsletter
Reddit Machine Learning

r/MachineLearning

Community
Naval Ravikant Profile

Naval Ravikant

Profile
Example X List

AI High Signal

List
Example RSS Feed

Stratechery

RSS

3

Get your briefs

Get concise daily or weekly updates with precise citations directly in your inbox. You control the focus, style, and length.

Release-Gate Reviews, Cheap Workers, and Tool-Call Friction
Jul 5
4 min read
64 docs
Theo - t3.gg
Julius
Armin Ronacher ⇌
+6
Simon Willison’s $149 release-gate review on sqlite-utils is the clearest practical signal today: use top-end agents where judgment matters most. Also in this brief: Theo’s concrete cost-control setup, Kent’s sidecar-agent handoff pattern, fresh Kody/integrations.sh plumbing, and a real warning on Anthropic edit-tool compatibility.

🔥 TOP SIGNAL

Best practical signal today: Simon Willison used Claude Fable as a final pre-release reviewer on sqlite-utils 4.0rc2, and it found/fixed five release blockers for an estimated $149.25—including a delete_where() transaction bug that could silently lose data after reopen . This was a real release sweep, not a demo: 37 prompts, 34 commits, 30 files, started with a breaking-change-focused prompt, and ended with Simon doing the last GitHub PR review himself .

⚡ TRY THIS

  • Run the expensive review at the end. Simon’s sequence is worth copying: point the agent at a near-final codebase, frame the task around last-minute breaking changes, review the docs edits first to get oriented, use subagents for parallel/cost-controlled sweeps, and do the final GitHub PR pass yourself. He also says Anthropic reviewing OpenAI output—and vice versa—keeps surfacing useful issues, so cross-model review is not superstition anymore

Final review before shipping a stable 4.0 release - very important to spot any last minute things that would be a breaking change if we fix them later

  • Don’t pay Fable to stare at PDFs. Theo routes PDFs, large codebase audits, bulk document scans, and screenshot-heavy computer use to Codex or other cheaper workers while Fable manages the thread. His rule is blunt: treat High as the ceiling, not X-high or Max; in his own usage, one thread handled ~25 PRs in ~5 hours and merged 15+ large/stale PRs while staying within subscription limits . After a long run, audit the spend with AgentsView plus session list --include-children, which Simon used to break out child-agent costs .

  • Exploit the dead time. Simon notes harder tasks often create 10-15 minute windows where the agent just churns, so he kept the session moving from his phone while away from his laptop; Theo says his first T3 Code Mobile thread was completed entirely from phone . Use the phone for nudges and checkpoints, then save the laptop for the final diff and PR review .

  • Use a sidecar, not an interruption. Kent’s Cursor/Kody pattern: keep the main cloud agent on the big task, spin up a second agent to research the new idea, then have that side agent send a follow-up message directly to the orchestrating agent only if the research is worth injecting .

📡 WHAT SHIPPED

  • sqlite-utils 4.0rc2 — Simon pushed the release through PR #767 with a shared transcript; the review loop produced 34 commits across 30 files and caught five release blockers before stable .
  • Kody + integrations.sh — Kent wired integrations.sh into Kody to simplify auth/setup for MCP, API, CLI, and GraphQL servers; implementation is in PR #604.
  • integrations.sh launch — Rhys Sullivan describes it as an open-source catalog of product MCP/API/CLI/GraphQL servers with deep links for API keys and copyable spec URLs .
  • Anthropic tool-call friction, now with a concrete writeup — In Better Models: Worse Tools, Simon says newer Claude models like Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 5 are inventing extra keys inside Pi’s nested edits[] schema; Armin’s theory is that training around Claude Code’s built-in edit tools may be hurting third-party harness compatibility .
  • Fable on iOS: strong world knowledge, weaker app intuition — Theo says Fable can navigate iOS simulators without custom skills better than Codex + the OpenAI plugin, but its intuition for iOS/mobile structure still trails its infra, database, and web performance .
  • codex.bar next version — Peter Steinberger says codex.bar will show exactly when resets expire, which should make usage planning less guessy .

🎬 GO DEEPER

  • 19:11-20:37 — Theo on teaching Fable to use Codex. Short but high-signal: this is the cleanest explanation today of where to draw the manager/worker boundary. Keep Fable on orchestration; offload token-heavy scanning and computer-use to cheaper specialists .
  • 17:40-18:21 — Theo on effort settings. If you’re burning quota, watch this one. His argument is that X-high and Max spike usage without meaningful quality gains for most work .
  • PR #767 — Study this as a real release-gate artifact, not a toy repo. The useful part is the bug mix: API surface, transaction handling, migrations, and docs all got touched in one review loop .
  • Kody PR #604 — Good artifact if you’re building agent tooling and want to reduce integration/setup friction inside the agent path itself .
  • shared transcript — Worth reading if you want to inspect a long, production-grade Claude Code session instead of a cherry-picked screenshot .

Editorial take: today’s clearest edge is using the expensive model for judgment at the release gate, then letting cheaper workers absorb the token-heavy grind.

Monaco’s Agentic Outbound Traction and USAF’s MoE Fine-Tuning Signal
Jul 5
3 min read
480 docs
Software As a Service Companies — The Future Of Tech Businesses
r/SideProject - A community for sharing side projects
SaaStr
Monaco provides the strongest GTM signal in this set, while SuperGrow shows a workable cash-and-distribution playbook for small AI SaaS. On the technical side, USAF proposes sparse fine-tuning for large MoE models on 12 GB hardware, and an AI bookkeeping startup highlights explainability as a core design requirement.

1) Funding & Deals

  • SuperGrow's pre-launch cash conversion is the clearest financing signal. Before launching on Product Hunt, the two-founder AI content tool for LinkedIn sold about $65K in lifetime deals to seed early users and reviews, then reinvested that cash into LinkedIn micro-influencer posts priced around $300-$500 each. Launch day added roughly 300 signups and 40 new paying customers .
  • Monaco's Anthropic meeting is the strongest early commercial deal datapoint. One of Monaco's first ten users says the platform booked a meeting with Anthropic on day one by aiming its best effort at a named target account during onboarding .

2) Emerging Teams

  • Monaco is the standout emerging team on founder background plus early proof. Sam Blond previously ran outbound at Brex, Zenefits, and EchoSign and was a partner at Founders Fund. Monaco builds TAM, structures multi-channel outbound sequences, and manages pipeline through close; early users say it was already booking meetings while the product was still raw .
  • SuperGrow shows meaningful traction in AI-assisted LinkedIn content. The company is run by two founders who build in public and now reports roughly $79.5K MRR across about 2,315 paying subscribers, still mostly founder-led .
  • The AI-native bookkeeping platform is an early vertical-fintech team worth tracking. It is being built for startups, argues against black-box AI finance tools, and the founder says Month-End Close is still under construction while actively asking developers and founders for feedback .

3) AI & Tech Breakthroughs

  • USAF is the strongest technical signal in the set. The new sparse fine-tuning method for MoE models is built around a simple premise: if a GPU can run inference on an MoE model, it should also be able to fine-tune it. The author says an AMD RX 6750 XT with 12 GB can fine-tune Qwen3-30B-A3B by training sparse expert weights and the router instead of adapters, and the project is open source under Apache 2.0 .
  • The bookkeeping product offers a concrete architecture for explainable AI in finance workflows. Transactions below an 85% confidence threshold are routed to a review queue that shows the model's reasoning, and the system uses a five-tier pipeline from deterministic rules through human review .
  • Its reporting layer adds ledger-level traceability. A P&L category can expand into the exact chronological transactions behind the number via double-entry SQL joins .

4) Market Signals

  • AI-native outbound looks more like a productivity expansion than a category collapse. The SaaStr essay argues outbound still works, but it now depends on deliberately ordered multi-channel sequences rather than raw message volume. It also frames a sharp economic shift: revenue per rep is roughly 2x pre-AI levels today and could reach 5x within two years as agents take over mechanical work .

"Revenue per rep today is roughly 2x what it was pre-AI. Within two years, it is plausibly 5x."

  • Explainability is emerging as a trust requirement in AI finance. One founder's core critique of existing tools is that they output a P&L without showing when the AI may have guessed wrong; the response is hard confidence gating plus visible reasoning and human review .
  • Small AI SaaS teams are still using staged distribution rather than purely organic growth. SuperGrow combined lifetime deals, build-in-public, and paid LinkedIn micro-influencer posts to create early user density and launch momentum .

5) Worth Your Time

China’s AI Buildout, Copilot’s Reset, and Fable 5’s Return
Jul 5
4 min read
467 docs
Sakana AI
CapCut
Tech Buzz China
+14
China’s AI infrastructure economics, Microsoft’s Copilot consolidation, and Fable 5’s return led the day. The brief also covers Sakana’s ICML research, new multimodal product launches, Moonshot’s research-first strategy, and Alibaba’s reported Claude Code ban.

Top Stories

Why it matters: the biggest signals today were about infrastructure, distribution, and models proving themselves in live use.

  • China’s AI compute push is scaling fast. One market analysis said the national computing power network could attract Rmb7tn of investment in 2026, with roughly Rmb2tn ($300bn) of data-center spending over five years. A typical GW-scale campus is modeled as 50%+ inference, but domestic chips still trail on performance: Nvidia is still seen holding 55% overall share, and Huawei 910B/910C servers were said to produce only 1/6 to 1/3 of an H800’s daily token output.
  • Microsoft is merging consumer and enterprise Copilot into one app. The August-targeted overhaul reportedly adds AI coding tools, paid AutoPilot agents, and add-ons like Copilot Cowork after cutting features customers were not using. Copilot had 20M paying users by April, up from 15M in January, but still trails ChatGPT’s 50M+ paid subscribers.
  • Fable 5 is back in public testing. Arena said the model has returned to Battle Mode and Agent Mode and had previously ranked #1 in Agent Arena; separate posts pointed to strong 3D-generation demos across 60+ hard tasks and one case where it chose propensity score matching in a retention analysis without being asked.

Research & Innovation

Why it matters: the strongest technical work focused on memory, efficiency, and better training data rather than just larger scale.

  • Sakana AI brought a broad ICML slate. Its 11 papers span multi-agent coordination, sparse LLMs, test-time scaling, long-term memory, and agent benchmarks. Highlights included FwPKM at about 75% 5-needle NIAH accuracy at 128K context, Doc-to-LoRA for internalizing documents into model weights, and TwELL sparse kernels with 20%+ speedups on billion-parameter models.
  • EfficientRollout targets RL’s biggest time sink. The paper says rollout generation consumes nearly 70% of LLM RL training time; its quantized self-drafter, roofline-based switch, and adaptive draft length produced up to 19.6% faster rollout generation and 12.7% faster training steps.
  • DolphinMath aims to make high-quality math data abundant. QuixiAI released a generator for unlimited math problems from elementary to postgraduate level, with mechanically correct step-by-step solutions for pretraining, SFT, and RL.

Products & Launches

Why it matters: new launches are turning multimodal performance and retrieval infrastructure into usable tools.

  • Google launched Nano Banana 2 Lite and Gemini Omni Flash. Nano Banana 2 Lite was priced at $0.034 per 1K images with four-second generation, while Gemini Omni Flash was priced at $0.10 per second for developer video generation and conversational editing.
  • LlamaIndex released Index v2 for agentic retrieval. It exposes retrieve, read, grep, and find APIs so agents can navigate evolving knowledge bases; the legal-kb reference app adds project-scoped knowledge bases, visual citations, version control, and data export.
  • Dreamina Seedance 2.5 is coming to CapCut. CapCut said it supports seamless generation and editing, up to 50 multimodal references, and 30-second scenes across web, desktop, and mobile.

Industry Moves

Why it matters: labs are differentiating through go-to-market choices and infrastructure strategy as much as model quality.

  • Moonshot AI is staying research-first. Its enterprise chief said Kimi will rely on partners for last-mile deployment instead of building a heavy services team; the company is reportedly raising $2B at about a $30B valuation, expanding via AWS, and says its KV-cache hit rate is above 90%.
  • OpenAI’s reported Jalapeño chip points to the silicon race. Posts said OpenAI unveiled its first custom AI chip, while a claimed nine-month design-to-tape-out timeline drew skepticism; a separate comment argued that at OpenAI’s scale, owning silicon is now necessary.

Policy & Regulation

Why it matters: model-access restrictions are starting to shape internal software policy at major companies.

  • Alibaba is reportedly banning Claude Code at work starting July 10. The company classified Anthropic’s coding agent as high-risk software after reports it contained checks for China-linked users; Anthropic already bars Chinese companies and foreign entities they own from using its models, and Alibaba is directing staff to its own Qoder tool.

Quick Takes

Why it matters: smaller updates still show where tooling, evals, and training methods are moving.

  • A team said it distilled 2.3M Claude Fable 5 reasoning traces into Qwen3-4B and open-sourced the weights.
  • Newer Claude models were reported to fail Pi’s edit tool more often than older versions, especially on tasks close to but not exactly on training distribution.
  • A practical MCP paper said tool-selection accuracy falls below 90% after 10-30 tools, while MCP itself adds little latency.
  • OctoTools was accepted as an ACL 2026 Oral, positioning its training-free tool-use framework for wider attention.
UN Opens Global AI Governance Talks as Edge Models Gain Traction and ROI Scrutiny Rises
Jul 5
2 min read
144 docs
UN Yemen
The Cognitive Revolution
Yoshua Bengio
+2
The UN’s first global AI governance dialogue led the day, with a direct focus on inclusion, transparency, and the international AI divide. Elsewhere, Liquid AI offered one of the clearest edge-AI commercialization signals, while skepticism about AI ROI sharpened around costs and measurable output.

UN opens a first formal venue for global AI governance

The United Nations launched what Yoshua Bengio described as its first platform for member states and other multistakeholders to discuss AI governance, with an emphasis on inclusivity and transparency . Bengio said frontier AI development is concentrated in two countries, a pattern that is raising concern in developing nations that fear an AI divide will leave them behind . He also pointed to an independent international scientific panel meant to establish a fact-based baseline and argued that effective AI governance will require multilateral, UN-led solutions .

"We don't speak for our countries. We don't speak for our companies. We speak for our expertise and this will set the baseline for the facts."

Why it matters: This is a concrete new venue for AI governance, and it puts the international AI divide at the center of the discussion alongside transparency and shared benefits .

Liquid AI makes a strong case for device-native foundation models

Liquid AI said its open-weight LFM family is now seeing more than 1 million weekly Hugging Face downloads and ranks fifth in the U.S. behind Google, Meta, Microsoft, and NVIDIA . The company also said LFM2/LFM2.5 models are already in production at Shopify, where they improved click-through on recommendation and search, and that a new Mercedes-Benz deal will put a 600MB Liquid model behind the car's voice system . On the research side, its Automated Foundation Model Design process used real target hardware and roughly 100 downstream benchmarks to converge on architectures built mostly from double-gated convolutions with a smaller share of attention, matching Liquid's broader view that architecture should change with scale and deployment setting .

Why it matters: This is a notable commercial and research signal for on-device AI, with production deployments and hardware-in-the-loop design pushing model architecture away from a one-size-fits-all frontier template .

Cost discipline is becoming a louder part of the AI conversation

Gary Marcus amplified commentary arguing that AI is in a "messy middle phase" where usage can look productive even when output remains unclear . The same discussion cited a Forbes framing that AI is now costing some companies more than the people it was supposed to replace, alongside claims that Uber reportedly burned its 2026 AI coding budget in four months and that Microsoft curbed an AI coding assistant after costs became hard to justify .

"AI is now costing some companies more than the people it was supposed to replace."

Why it matters: In prominent commentary, AI economics are being judged more directly on cost discipline and demonstrable output, not just visible usage or activity .

Evidence-First Discovery and the Post-Launch Reality Check
Jul 5
4 min read
46 docs
Product Management
Product Management
Lenny Rachitsky
+2
This brief centers on evidence-first discovery: trust past behavior over stated interest, avoid false validation from free pilots, and improve both your research questions and synthesis. It also includes a useful launch case study on how quickly performance, bugs, and feedback overtake feature work after shipping.

Big Ideas

  • Discovery signal comes from behavior, not enthusiasm. In a discussion about workflow tools, the strongest advice was to ask what customers have already spent and what they have already done to solve the problem, because past behavior is more useful than uncommitted opinion . Why it matters: polite interest can look like validation when no urgent pain exists. How to apply: treat existing spend, workarounds, and failed attempts as your baseline evidence before prioritizing a problem.

  • Do not confuse free adoption with real demand. The same thread argues against unpaid pilots that effectively bribe usage when no urgent problem exists . Why it matters: free custom work can create false positives. How to apply: look for commitment signals that would exist without subsidizing the user.

  • Research quality depends on two unglamorous skills: better questions and trustworthy synthesis. PMs called out writing good interview or survey questions early enough, and keeping synthesis organized enough to find and trust later, as recurring workflow pain points . Why it matters: weak questions produce weak input, and messy synthesis makes insights hard to reuse.

Tactical Playbook

  1. Pressure-test a workflow problem before solutioning.

    • Ask what the user does today, what they have spent, and what they have already tried .
    • Separate urgent pain from a mere chance to automate a workflow; the advice was explicit: solve serious problems, not just automation opportunities .
    • Avoid using unpaid pilots as proof of demand . If adoption depends on free labor, treat that as weak validation.
  2. Tighten the front end and back end of research.

    • On the front end, scrutinize interview and survey questions because many PMs feel they only discover bad questions after running them a few times .
    • On the back end, keep synthesis organized enough that you can find it and trust it later .
    • Use both together: better prompts improve the input, and better synthesis improves the next round of learning .

Case Studies & Lessons

  • A small launch showed how quickly the work changes after shipping. One solo founder said the goal was simply to see whether strangers would use a free product . After launch, most time shifted to bug fixes, performance work, user outreach, social posting, and feedback replies rather than new coding . The product crossed 100 users by the morning of July 5 and 200+ by that evening .

"Shipping beats polishing. If I had waited until everything was \"perfect,\" I'd probably still be coding instead of getting feedback."

Why it matters for PMs: real usage changes what matters first. In this case, the first optimization was a slow database query, not the UI , and real users found bugs faster than solo testing did .

How to apply: plan the first post-launch cycle around performance, bug triage, and feedback handling—not just the next feature list. Also reserve time for distribution and user conversations; the founder said those efforts took as much time as writing code .

Career Corner

  • Generalist PMs are looking for deeper functional depth. One current discussion framed self-upgrading around building stronger capability in data, analytics, or design. Why it matters: for PMs with broad scope, a clearer area of depth can make development more concrete. How to apply: pick one of those functions as your next focused learning track and connect it to work you already own.

  • A compact update on product taste: it is learnable. Shreyas Doshi described taste as more than aesthetics; it also includes systems thinking, direction-setting, how to present to users, and the wider context around the product . He also said taste is more learnable than many people assume . How to apply: use reviews to practice judgment about context and direction, not just polish.

Tools & Resources

  • The Mom Test surfaced again as a useful anchor for discovery interviews . The practical takeaway from that thread: use it to keep conversations grounded in what customers have already done, spent, and worked around—not what they say they might do.
The Wright Brothers Leads Today's Aviation-Innovation Reading Picks
Jul 5
2 min read
103 docs
andrew chen
20VC with Harry Stebbings
Clay Pavone's detailed endorsement of *The Wright Brothers* stood out as today's strongest learning signal, with Andrew Chen adding a second aerospace-history recommendation. The shared theme is invention told through concrete engineering stories rather than abstract advice.

Most compelling pick

The Wright Brothers is the clearest recommendation today because Clay Pavone explained why he values it, not just that he liked it. He framed the book as a practical study of invention: breakthrough products rely on enabling technologies already in place, progress comes through repeated failed attempts, and the outcome depends on endurance as much as insight .

The Wright Brothers

  • Content type: Book
  • Author/creator: David McCullough
  • Link/URL: Not provided in the source notes
  • Who recommended it: Clay Pavone (Sierra co-founder), in a 20VC interview
  • Key takeaway: Pavone called it a "tight history" of the invention of the first heavier-than-air aircraft and said it is "as accurate a portrait of entrepreneurship and invention as has been written anywhere." He highlighted the role of prior inventions such as the lightweight internal combustion engine, the repeated failures, the hardship in North Carolina, and the eventual triumph
  • Why it matters: This recommendation doubles as a founder lesson: major advances can emerge from existing technical building blocks, iteration, and persistence rather than a single isolated breakthrough

"It is as accurate a portrait of entrepreneurship and invention as has been written anywhere."

One additional aerospace-history signal

Title not specified in the source notes

  • Content type: Book
  • Author/creator: Not specified in the source notes
  • Link/URL: Not provided in the source notes
  • Who recommended it: Andrew Chen, in an X post
  • Key takeaway: Chen recommended a book with "wonderful stories" about the creation of the F-117 Nighthawk, U2 spy plane, SR-71 Blackbird, and more
  • Why it matters: Even with incomplete bibliographic detail in the extracted notes, the recommendation points readers toward concrete innovation stories from advanced aircraft development

Pattern

Today's signal clustered around aviation and invention history. The stronger entry, The Wright Brothers, came with a detailed explanation of how new technology gets built . Andrew Chen's post reinforced the same theme by pointing readers to aircraft-development stories from later eras .

Start with signal

Each agent already tracks a curated set of sources. Subscribe for free and start getting cited updates right away.

Coding Agents Alpha Tracker avatar

Coding Agents Alpha Tracker

Daily · Tracks 110 sources
Elevate
Simon Willison's Weblog
Latent Space
+107

Daily high-signal briefing on coding agents: how top engineers use them, the best workflows, productivity tips, high-leverage tricks, leading tools/models/systems, and the people leaking the most alpha. Built for developers who want to stay at the cutting edge without drowning in noise.

AI in EdTech Weekly avatar

AI in EdTech Weekly

Weekly · Tracks 92 sources
Luis von Ahn
Khan Academy
Ethan Mollick
+89

Weekly intelligence briefing on how artificial intelligence and technology are transforming education and learning - covering AI tutors, adaptive learning, online platforms, policy developments, and the researchers shaping how people learn.

VC Tech Radar avatar

VC Tech Radar

Daily · Tracks 120 sources
a16z
Stanford eCorner
Greylock
+117

Daily AI news, startup funding, and emerging teams shaping the future

Bitcoin Payment Adoption Tracker avatar

Bitcoin Payment Adoption Tracker

Daily · Tracks 109 sources
BTCPay Server
Nicolas Burtey
Roy Sheinbaum
+106

Monitors Bitcoin adoption as a payment medium and currency worldwide, tracking merchant acceptance, payment infrastructure, regulatory developments, and transaction usage metrics

AI News Digest avatar

AI News Digest

Daily · Tracks 114 sources
Google DeepMind
OpenAI
Anthropic
+111

Daily curated digest of significant AI developments including major announcements, research breakthroughs, policy changes, and industry moves

Global Agricultural Developments avatar

Global Agricultural Developments

Daily · Tracks 86 sources
RDO Equipment Co.
Ag PhD
Precision Farming Dealer
+83

Tracks farming innovations, best practices, commodity trends, and global market dynamics across grains, livestock, dairy, and agricultural inputs

Recommended Reading from Tech Founders avatar

Recommended Reading from Tech Founders

Daily · Tracks 137 sources
Paul Graham
David Perell
Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸
+134

Tracks and curates reading recommendations from prominent tech founders and investors across podcasts, interviews, and social media

PM Daily Digest avatar

PM Daily Digest

Daily · Tracks 100 sources
Shreyas Doshi
Gibson Biddle
Teresa Torres
+97

Curates essential product management insights including frameworks, best practices, case studies, and career advice from leading PM voices and publications

AI High Signal Digest avatar

AI High Signal Digest

Daily · Tracks 1 source
AI High Signal

Comprehensive daily briefing on AI developments including research breakthroughs, product launches, industry news, and strategic moves across the artificial intelligence ecosystem

Frequently asked questions

Choose the setup that fits how you work

Free

Follow public agents at no cost.

$0

No monthly fee

Unlimited subscriptions to public agents
No billing setup

Plus

14-day free trial

Get personalized briefs with your own agents.

$20

per month

$20 of usage each month

Private by default
Any topic you follow
Daily or weekly delivery

$20 of usage during trial

Supercharge your knowledge discovery

Start free with public agents, then upgrade when you want your own source-controlled briefs on autopilot.