We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Big Ideas
Freshworks’ AI PDLC shifts product value from operations to judgment. Freshworks is reported to have moved from six-month to two-week releases, from a 1:20 to a 1:1 PM-to-engineer ratio on AI teams, and from build loops measured in days to seconds. The sequence matters: build a knowledge, context, and skills foundation; let agents do the first 80% of each lifecycle stage; reserve the final 20% for human editing and taste; standardize the tool stack; ground agents in product, customer, competitive, and customer-voice data; and prototype against the live product shell. Freshworks piloted PRD Genie before standardizing it, changed team shape only after the operating model worked, and describes the PM value shift as moving from operational work to judgment. Apply: pilot one workflow with a named human evaluation gate before changing team ratios.
Frontier-AI PM work is a hypothesis loop, not a long-range plan. Tara Seshan’s operating model is to isolate the one question that determines whether the product works, test it with users quickly, inspect the result, and refine the hypothesis. Agents do more of the “rowing,” while the PM steers; product bets should target model capability roughly two to three months ahead and stay tied to the research roadmap.
Tactical Playbook
Give early signals a holding pattern. The “Right But Early Club” framework separates being right from being right now or right here. Use a three-step protocol: (1) state the observation with uncertainty and say that immediate action is not requested; (2) invite others to add evidence, challenge the pattern, or connect related observations; and (3) record what would make it important, then revisit it as evidence changes. This avoids the unproductive choice between acting immediately and stopping the conversation.
When ownership is contested, test decision rights—not process. A current PM discussion describes an organization where business SMEs, engineering managers, and PMs all claim the product role. For one product, map who owns the business outcome, priority and trade-offs, domain evidence, technical decisions, and the gate for creating engineering work; get leadership approval and see whether it defends those boundaries in conflict. In domain-heavy products, let SMEs own domain truth and workflow validation while the PM owns the decision trail: what was heard, chosen, rejected, and why.
For a new B2B category, validate budget before funding. A medtech response suggests interviewing 30 surgical educators and trainees over three months about current workflows, pain, failures, and purchasing; stop if fewer than 10 describe the problem as urgent and costly, and wait for written evidence that institutions will pay before recruiting a technical cofounder or seeking funding. Only then show the cheapest workable prototype and ask about price and payer—interest without a budget is not demand.
Case Studies & Lessons
Completion—not signup—predicted payment. A self-serve brand-strategy tool reports 1,300+ signups, 300+ completed brands, and about 12 paying customers across 16 purchases; every payer had completed a brand first. Gating exports, downloads, or team use rather than the core workflow worked better than charging for creation, while subscriptions, a one-time unlock, and credit packs all found buyers. Reddit supplied 74% of referred traffic versus 2% from X on an 82-visitor base, but the founder could not attribute revenue to any channel. Takeaway: instrument the completion event, place payment at the value handoff, and keep acquisition traffic separate from revenue attribution.
Career Corner
Build evidence and make it searchable. Community advice favors experience, a live product, and customer acquisition over stopping at prototypes; it also points candidates toward APM or product-builder requirements as a practical target. On the resume, put a first-page Tools line, list only tools you can defend, and state hands-on ability plainly—for example, “writes own SQL.”
Tools & Resources
Page Bot opens three to five public pages each morning, compares them with the prior day, and alerts only when a meaningful change occurs; cookie banners, ads, and clocks are ignored. Use the pattern for lightweight competitor, pricing-page, or changelog monitoring.
- AI product strategy — optimize for learning and near-term model capability. In fast-moving AI markets, favor prolific empirical work over long theoretical plans: stay close to research, define the product’s single most important hypothesis, test it with users quickly, inspect the results, refine the hypothesis, and rerun the loop. Build for the model capability expected in roughly two to three months—not today’s model and not a speculative one-year future—and align product development tightly with the research roadmap.
- AI-enabled PM leverage — expand range, not just automation. Effective AI users apply it to widen what they can bring from idea to reality, including designs, prototypes, pricing models, and scenario analysis; PMs should raise the team’s ambition by asking whether the scope ceiling is higher and whether delivery can be accelerated. The operating prompts “is this maximally accelerated?” and “are you mainlining it yet?” translate into checking speed, using the product continuously, applying product judgment, and tightening the feedback loop.
- Validate positioning before committing product shape, especially for enterprise products. Product-market fit is not enough: combine deep technology understanding with enterprise-sales understanding, test the product-marketing narrative before building the full experience, pitch roughly 100 people, refine the pitch, and only then commit to the product shape.
- Use different modes of writing for different PM work. Automate reporting, summarization, and format translation, but write strategy and product-thinking briefs yourself; AI can assist in the middle with targeted research, data gathering, or challenging ideas, while the human should start and finish the document. A practical collaboration pattern is to take a brief to about 70% completion, then invite the people whose buy-in matters to attack and strengthen it; for communication, interactive mocks or prototypes and experiment results can be more effective than polished documents.
- Keep roles fluid but accountability explicit. Engineers, designers, and PMs can cross traditional role boundaries and pick up whatever work is needed, but one DRI must own whether the product is wanted, used, high quality, and effective.
- Abstract away agent complexity and ship into feedback loops. The product direction described for ChatGPT/Codex is to let users state a task and have the system choose the appropriate model or harness, rather than forcing them to understand and select among internal modes; the current separation mainly accommodates different user familiarity and interfaces. When introducing transformative agent capabilities to a broad audience, getting them into users’ hands can matter more than perfect polish, provided the team listens to the right signals and iterates quickly on usability and adoption.
- Design knowledge-work agents for inspectability, not only final-output quality. Unlike coding tasks that can often be verified with tests, knowledge work requires confidence in the inputs, process, reasoning, and intermediate work; agent products should therefore expose in-progress work, citations, and source inputs so users can verify and collaborate toward the final result.
- Validate PMF through founder-led selling before specialized hiring: A sales/BD practitioner says founders usually conduct some product-market-fit testing before bringing in sales, while another founder argues that the CEO is the main salesperson and learned selling through trial and error.
- Separate sales from business development when defining the role and compensation: Selling a proven product or service is described as usually commission-based, whereas business development is more likely to involve salary or cash tied to relationships or fundraising; for cold outreach or market entry, the seller should understand the target sector and its key players because entering unfamiliar territory is described as costly.
- Use external commercial support selectively: Investors may help generate and qualify pipeline, sales advisors can contribute networks and deal support, and fractional sellers are an option, although they commonly seek a six-month commitment.
- OpenAI’s internal “mainlining” test treats deep personal usage as a product signal: teams should use a product all day, depend on it, and apply their own taste to judge whether people truly want it. The shift toward Codex was attributed not to a formal internal change, but to employees beginning to notice and rely on it.
- For products built on frontier models, Tara Seshan’s planning rule is to build for where the models will be in 2–3 months: building for today risks becoming obsolete, while building for a year ahead misses the practical near-term horizon.
- AI is shifting PM work from “rowing” to “steering”: agents perform more of the execution, while PMs increasingly direct the work and elevate the ambition of the people around them.
- OpenAI’s “mainlining” heuristic treats deep internal product dependence as a strong product signal: teams should ask whether they use the product all day, depend on it, and apply their own judgment about whether people genuinely want it.
- For products built on frontier models, Tara Seshan recommends building for where the models are likely to be in 2–3 months—rather than optimizing for today’s capabilities or planning a year ahead.
- Seshan attributed the internal shift toward Codex not to a specific product or organizational change, but to people gradually noticing its value through use.
- Stress-test product ideas before building: identify what must be true for the idea to work, examine the underlying assumptions, look for evidence that they hold, and determine what to test next.
- Generate automation ideas from recurring personal work: when unsure what to build, start with a task you repeatedly do yourself and turn that workflow into a focused bot or repeatable capability.
- Hiten Shah’s third bot turns public web pages into notifications: it opens 3–5 tracked pages each morning, compares them with the previous day, and alerts users only when something they care about changes.
- The product minimizes setup and alert noise by accepting either one fact or a URL, keeping the first check silent, and ignoring cookie banners, ads, and clocks as meaningful changes.
- Framework: The “Right But Early Club” (RBEC) captures people who spot problems, consequences, or solutions before others are ready to act; effective organizations need both weak-signal detection and attention-gating/prioritization, rather than treating one capability as competence and the other as dysfunction.
- Practice: Separate raising an early signal from demanding immediate action. Create a shared mechanism for saying, “I think I’m seeing something… I’m not sure yet… it is worth noticing,” then let others add evidence, challenge the pattern, connect related observations, and define what would make it important. Revisit the signal as new evidence arrives instead of forcing a binary “act now” or “stop talking about it” decision.
- Decision caveat: “Being right” is not sufficient if there is no owner for the issue, leadership constraints block action, or more urgent problems take priority; timing and organizational context determine whether an insight is right now or right here. This process can reduce pressure to win an argument immediately while allowing the group to refine whether the signal reflects the problem, mechanism, timing, or an unseen constraint.
- Product dysfunction becomes structural when an organization lacks a dedicated product function, operating model, consistent PM discipline, and leadership backing. In this environment, business SMEs and engineering managers may claim PM ownership, AI-generated “product documents” may go directly to engineering, and experienced PMs end up doing product work without recognized authority.
- A practical governance test is to select one product and explicitly map who owns discovery, business outcomes, prioritization and trade-offs, scope, acceptance, domain evidence, technical decisions, and the gate for creating engineering work; obtain leadership approval and observe whether those boundaries are defended during conflict. If leadership will not defend them, the exhaustion is likely structural rather than an individual PM failure. AI-generated artifacts can make convincing product documents cheaply, but they do not prove that a problem is worth solving or that the author has authority to create work.
- In domain-heavy products, a workable ownership split is for subject-matter experts to own domain truth and workflow validation while the PM owns the decision trail: customer or stakeholder input, selected and rejected options, and rationale. That traceability can become a durable source of influence. For burnout, commenters recommend distinguishing an unsupported job from the PM profession, using the PM network to identify organizations with stronger product support, and developing a specialization such as APIs and integrations.
- For a newly promoted PMM manager whose work is largely executional, progression comes from moving beyond taking leadership’s orders toward identifying gaps and bringing customer insights that can shift strategy.
- Turn each request into a decision brief covering the buyer problem, target segment, supporting evidence, and signal that will show whether it worked; use a monthly report of sales-call patterns, objections, win/loss notes, and content usage to own market interpretation.
- Make contribution measurable by connecting reach to downstream outcomes such as website visits, demo requests, leads, closed deals, average deal size, and spend, then use the resulting ROI evidence to demonstrate strategy ownership; if no hard metrics exist, define them.
- When the role is primarily support, make the service measurable through volume, quality, and service-level expectations; if that role is too limiting, pitch leadership on a modified role with higher-value responsibilities.
- A discussion on executive visibility highlights a recurring ownership tension: PMs may present a feature to VPs even when engineering built it through a joint team effort, with engineers summarized as “the team.”
- The role-based rationale is that PMs select features, allocate resources, and connect the product to customers and other business functions, making them natural executive-facing presenters. The thread distinguishes this from implementation ownership: engineers can also demo features, while PMs are expected to explain the rationale and business outcomes.
- A useful operating principle is to make team contributions visible while presenting the outcomes executives care about: correct operation, user or business impact, and measurable results. The counterweight is accountability—one commenter argues that PMs should also absorb blame when the team fails to deliver, not only receive presentation visibility.
For a first Microsoft PM internship recruiter screen, one commenter advises prioritizing PM-style communication and basic familiarity with Microsoft products, characterizing the conversation as mainly a “vibe and keywords” check; deeper evaluation is expected later.
- Students pursuing product management should prioritize hands-on experience over a specific degree: PMs often transition from development, analytics, design, or another product-related specialty, with internships and real-world work serving as common entry routes. A practical portfolio tactic is to study APM or product-builder requirements, launch a real product rather than only prototypes, and work on acquiring customers.
- Useful preparation includes human behavior, statistics, problem solving, creative writing, public speaking, engineering and design fundamentals, group or personal projects, taste, and empathy. For technology PM roles, commenters also suggest computer science, data science, and economics coursework.
- For PM resumes, the post recommends surfacing relevant tool keywords—such as Amplitude, Jira, SQL, Looker, and Segment—prominently because recruiters and ATS filters may search for exact terms; it suggests adding a first-page “Tools” line, listing only tools the candidate can defend, and stating hands-on capabilities plainly (for example, “writes own SQL”).
- A fast-growing fintech reports that its manual KYC review queue has become unmanageable as fraud grows more sophisticated and compliance requirements rise, leaving its team unable to clear the backlog.
- Its vendor-switch evaluation centers on replacing a fragmented stack with one integration covering document verification, biometrics, AML, sanctions, and PEP checks, while validating performance at scale and whether multi-jurisdiction compliance works beyond sales claims.
An India-based PM with approximately 11 years of B2B SaaS experience is seeking compensation guidance after encountering what they describe as “astonishingly low” market numbers. Replies indicate that a meaningful salary range requires more role and context details, while employer compensation can vary sharply: some companies pay heavily, whereas others may feel like lowballers relative to those outlier offers.
- Start with workflow discovery: For an early-stage B2B medtech product, spend the first three months interviewing 30 surgical educators and trainees about the tools they use, where those tools fail, what a better solution must do, and how purchasing decisions are made. Avoid asking whether they would use the product; probe current workflows, pain, and what would justify a budget line.
- Set an evidence gate before building or funding: Stop if fewer than 10 people describe the target problem as urgent and costly, and delay recruiting a technical co-founder or seeking funding until there is written evidence that institutions will pay.
- Demonstrate, rather than explain, a new category: After understanding the workflow problem, show users the cheapest possible prototype or simplest version of the vision and observe behavior. Test latent demand by asking about pricing and whether users can identify who would pay; interest without a budget or payer may indicate a hobby rather than a market.
PM candidates should surface defensible tool experience prominently for recruiter and ATS searches: add a “Tools” line near the bottom of page one, list only skills they can defend, and state hands-on capabilities plainly—for example, “writes own SQL.”
- For products in categories with little existing search intent, use a pre-product/market-fit problem/solution-fit sequence: validate that the pain is strong enough for people to seek a solution and that the proposed solution fits the pain; identify the segment feeling it most intensely; find where that segment gathers beyond category or App Store keywords; then select channels based on the specific market.
- Expect awareness-building in a new market to take time and apply patience while validating demand.
A content manager with 10+ years in content, SEO, and content-team/project management is exploring a transition into Product without a formal Product title, an IT degree, or current coding proficiency. They are weighing whether to prioritize skill development, courses or certifications, building a product themselves, and volunteering with a more experienced product professional.
- Diagnose before buying traffic: The founder’s viral social videos generate substantial traffic and signups, but much of that traffic is curiosity-driven and low intent; some paying customers still discovered the product through the content, suggesting that organic content builds trust while also attracting a mismatched audience. The thread recommends first determining whether visitors are the intended customer profile or whether the messaging fails to match expectations, then identifying where qualified users drop off; paid ads would otherwise amplify the funnel problem.
- Clarify positioning and onboarding: The product is a creator tool for making simulation-style short-form videos, but the videos attract viewers who think they are coming to find or play a game; the founder sees this audience mismatch as a contributor to low conversion. Before testing paid acquisition, the suggested readiness checklist is customer proof such as reviews and case studies, a conversion-optimized website, easy signup and onboarding, and a clearly defined ICP.
- Use small validation experiments: The founder’s stated goal is to test whether paid acquisition can produce customers profitably before scaling, with an open question about running small experiments personally versus hiring an experienced freelancer; no paid-test outcome is reported.