We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
Strongest recommendation
Dialectic 56: Miles Grimshaw — Back Down the Mountain
- Content type / creator: Podcast/video from Dialectic Pod, featuring Miles Grimshaw, an investor at Thrive Capital. The episode is available on the linked post and on other platforms.
- Recommended by: Martin Casado, who called it “a great discussion with an exceptional investor.”
- Key takeaway: The conversation treats AI as a challenge to the assumptions underlying venture-backed software: which moats persist, whether software is over, and how to use the questions “what is it?” and “who cares?” It also covers founder vision, learning as a generalist, and making high-conviction decisions without domain expertise.
- Why it matters: This is the most directly useful founder/investor resource in the set because it turns the AI transition into a method for pressure-testing company narratives, not just a reason to admire new models.
Systems and security
Reflections on Trusting Trust — Ken Thompson
- Content type / creator: Technical essay/paper by Ken Thompson. No resource URL was included in Amjad Masad’s recommendation.
- Recommended by: Amjad Masad, who said it felt “super relevant to AI.”
- Key takeaway: Thompson’s example is a “poisoned” compiler that leaves no trace in its source code because it compiles itself. Masad maps the same pattern onto models: one poisoned generation could help train the next while erasing evidence of the contamination.
- Why it matters: It is a compact threat model for model and data provenance: downstream systems may inherit a hidden failure even when ordinary source inspection finds nothing suspicious.
What remains when work changes
After Work, We’ll Have Each Other
- Content type / creator: Essay by Clara Collier (
@clarabcollier). Patrick Collison called it a “great essay” and linked it directly. - Key takeaway: The essay conditionally starts from a world in which AI surpasses humans at economically necessary labor, then asks whether relationships become the main remaining scarce domain. Its counterpoint is that work supplies impersonal routes to competence, respect, and independence; a society where dignity depends mainly on group membership and personal ties can become restrictive and clannish.
- Why it matters: For builders and investors, this is a sharper test than “does automation save labor?”: what replaces work’s status, belonging, and competence functions, and does the replacement broaden access to recognition or make it dependent on closed networks?
Being John Rawls
- Content type / creator: Essay by Scott Alexander. Not Boring’s Weekly Dose of Optimism gives it an unusually explicit recommendation: “stop what you’re doing and read” it.
- Key takeaway: The story turns the veil of ignorance into a role-reversal device: imagine entering life without knowing whether you will be rich or poor, powerful or vulnerable, and then choose the rules. The essay makes that framework explicit as rules rational agents would enact without knowing which life they will receive.
- Why it matters: It is a memorable decision tool for policies and products whose consequences depend on which side of an allocation, market, or technological shift the reader ends up on.
A corrective to productivity culture
The Atlantic’s meditation-downsides article
- Content type / creator: Reported article from The Atlantic; the byline is not supplied in the recommendation.
- Recommended by: Morgan Housel, who called it a “good piece” and highlighted its argument that meditation is not merely relaxation or clearing the mind, but a fundamental change in one’s relationship to thought.
- Key takeaway: The article follows Willoughby Britton’s research into meditation’s adverse effects, including anxiety, panic, paranoia, and—in some cases—more severe symptoms. It also stresses the limits of the evidence: the cited study recruited people who had already experienced problems, so it could not establish prevalence or causality.
- Why it matters: Its value is as a disciplined corrective to treating every self-improvement practice as a universal productivity tool: the article preserves evidence of benefits while arguing that a practice causing harm should be modified or stopped.
Identification: The source bundle titles the essay Being John Rawls; no author is supplied (author: nil), and the text begins with an elided heading rather than a byline.
Central argument: The essay questions judging people’s moral worth or charitable deservingness solely from the social position they happen to occupy. The Rawls Foundation gives aid only to poor people who, under a counterfactual reversal in which they were rich and the donors were poor, would help the donors; the banker objects that hypothetical willingness is not the same as actually having helped, while the visionary argues that luck should not determine moral credit.
Key thought experiment/framework: A drug and hypnotic induction make a person experience an entire lifetime with social roles reversed, allowing the Foundation to test what they would do if they were poor or rich. The story makes the underlying Rawlsian framework explicit: morality consists of rules that rational agents would choose “behind a veil of ignorance,” without knowing which life they will enter at birth.
Why it makes the recommendation useful: The role-reversal device turns an abstract fairness principle into a memorable test: evaluate a rule without knowing whether one will occupy the banker’s or the alcoholic’s position. The later account of rebirth extends the same perspective-taking logic to the consequences imposed on others. The text does not present a separate authorial thesis in expository form, so the central argument is an interpretation of the fictional Foundation test and the explicit veil-of-ignorance formulation.
Essay:After Work, We’ll Have Each Other. Author: not provided in the supplied bundle.
Central argument: If AI surpasses humans at economically necessary labor, relationships may become the main remaining scarce domain of work and meaning. The essay argues, however, that a society organized primarily around relationships can make dignity depend on group membership, reputation, conformity, and personal access to power, rather than on individual accomplishment.
Most useful framework for founders and investors — relational versus impersonal dignity: Evaluate technologies not only by the labor or income they remove, but by whether they preserve broad, impersonal ways for people to earn respect through competence, useful contributions, skills, and accomplishments. The essay’s evidence suggests that work supplies social recognition and independence even when the job is not a vocation, while purely relational systems tend to become restrictive, exclusionary, and clannish.
Applied as a product or investment test, ask: What replaces work’s status and belonging functions? Does the system create new paths to competence, contribution, and peer respect, or does it make opportunity and dignity depend on closed networks, inherited position, or conformity? This distinction matters because the essay links impersonal work and markets to personal independence and freer friendship, while warning that removing those structures can allow older forms of dependence to reassert themselves.
Caveat: The author explicitly says they are not certain that AI will actually produce the more relational world described in the essay.
Title:The Dark Side of Mindfulness. Author: Not identified in the supplied bundle (its author field is nil).
Thesis: Meditation has documented benefits, but it is not universally benign: for some people—especially with intensive practice—it can produce adverse effects ranging from insomnia, anxiety, depression, and dissociation to psychosis. The article argues that meditation research and teaching have often failed to ask about, acknowledge, or adequately respond to these risks.
Most decision-relevant insight: The risks are not confined to extreme retreats. In a study that recruited only people who had experienced adverse effects, 28% reported problems arising from everyday, non-retreat practice and 25% were meditating less than an hour a day; however, that sampling means the study cannot establish how prevalent the harms are or prove that meditation caused the symptoms.
Why it may be worth reading: The article is a corrective rather than a blanket rejection of meditation: it preserves evidence of benefits, presents defenders’ counterarguments, and concludes that people should modify, change, or stop a practice that is harming them.
- MIT study on ChatGPT-assisted essay writing (research paper): A panelist recommended an MIT study from NIH to Friedberg, calling it “very interesting” and telling him to look it up. The discussion said the study followed 54 participants across four sessions over four months and compared ChatGPT, traditional web search, and writing without tools. It reported “severe deficits” in memory and essay ownership among LLM users, with 83% unable to quote essays they had just written.
- Scott Alexander — Being John Rawls (essay): Packy McCormick gives it an explicit “stop what you’re doing and read” recommendation, in the context of Rawls’s Veil of Ignorance and the thought experiment of choosing when to be born without knowing one’s identity or circumstances.
- Casey Handmer — NASA’s Orion Space Capsule Is Flaming Garbage (article): McCormick says “please read” Handmer’s sharply critical piece about his former employer, NASA.
- WSJ — See the New Building Techniques Turbocharging the Data-Center Boom (article): McCormick calls it “short, sweet, and mostly visual” and highlights its explanation that hyperscalers’ need for speed is driving time-saving products and construction techniques.
Martin Casado recommends Dialectic 56: Miles Grimshaw — Back Down the Mountain, a Dialectic Pod podcast/video episode featuring Miles Grimshaw, identified as an investor at Thrive Capital; Casado calls it a “Great discussion with an exceptional investor.”
The episode covers infinite games, changing assumptions and moats in software, founder vision, and learning as a generalist, including the questions “what is it?” and “who cares?” Video
Patrick Collison recommended Clara B. Collier’s essay “After Work, We’ll Have Each Other”, calling it a “great essay.” He also recommended subscribing to Asterisk and Works in Progress, noting that Asterisk has “a very good print edition.”
Patrick Collison recommends Ruxandra Teslo’s opinion article on clinical trials, calling it “excellent and important,” and links to the piece: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/04/opinion/clinical-trials-drugs-science.html
- Article — The Atlantic piece on the downside of meditation: Morgan Housel recommended it as a “good piece,” highlighting its argument that meditation is not merely about relaxation or clearing the mind, but about fundamentally changing one’s relationship to thoughts—an approach that may not fit someone simply seeking greater workplace productivity. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/09/meditation-willoughby-britton-downsides/688474/
- Amjad Masad recommends Ken Thompson’s “Reflections on Trusting Trust” as highly relevant to AI. The piece’s poisoned self-compiling compiler example illustrates how a model could pass hidden poisoning from one generation into the next while removing traces of it.