We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The standout: Patrick Collison’s primary texts on beauty
Patrick Collison’s most emphatic recommendation is John Ruskin’s The Nature of Gothic: he calls it “the best thing I’ve read this year” while considering whether aesthetics connect to ethics and the good life. In the same discussion, he points to Solzhenitsyn’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech, saying its “ancient triad” of beauty, goodness, and truth—and its claim that beauty carries its own verification—moved him.
The Nature of Gothic
- Type: Reading
- Creator: John Ruskin
- URL: No direct URL supplied in the interview
- Recommended by: Patrick Collison
- Key takeaway: Ruskin is presented as a thinker who took a serious connection between aesthetics and the good life.
- Why it matters: This is the clearest primary-text lead for the ethical question behind Collison’s interest in aesthetics—not simply what looks beautiful, but what relationship beauty might have to a life well lived.
Solzhenitsyn’s Nobel Prize acceptance speech
- Type: Speech
- Creator: Solzhenitsyn
- URL: No direct URL supplied in the interview
- Recommended by: Patrick Collison
- Key takeaway: Collison highlights the speech’s “ancient triad” of beauty, goodness, and truth, especially its argument that beauty is distinctive because it contains its own verification.
- Why it matters: It supplies a compact philosophical companion to Ruskin: beauty is treated not merely as preference, but as a possible route toward truths that are harder to establish through argument alone.
The most actionable founder heuristic
“The more people you consult for advice, the more likely you’ll make a bad/average decision”
- Type: X post
- Creator: Scott Belsky
- Recommended by: Keith Rabois, who replied “This!”, and Andrew Chen, who framed it as a red flag when founders cite what their friends said instead of reasoning from first principles.
- Key takeaway: Belsky’s case against advice-by-committee is specific: people are generally risk-averse, may resent opportunities they lack, and often mix cynicism with useful criticism.
- Why it matters: This is a usable filter for high-stakes founder decisions: distinguish substantive criticism from the social comfort of collecting a “friend vote” before acting.
AI infrastructure: read the operational and financing layer
“Nvidia is speedrunning the creation of a synthetic hyperscaler”
- Type: X analysis post
- Creator: @_clarktang
- Recommended by: Brad Gerstner, who called it “Important framing.”
- Key takeaway: Tang defines a hyperscaler as both a financial and operational system, then argues that Nvidia has assembled the operational layer—DSX OS, Mission Control, reference designs, digital twins, and Dynamo—and a financing layer based on revenue sharing and credit support that brings $500B of third-party capital to the market.
- Why it matters: The post offers a sharper way to assess AI infrastructure than looking only at chip demand: ask who is supplying the software, standardized designs, utilization model, and capital needed to run accelerated-compute fleets. Tang discloses that he may hold positions in companies mentioned and labels the post discourse rather than financial advice.
Investor updates: momentum matters, but transparency is the durable asset
“My thoughts on investor updates”
- Type: X post
- Creator: Keith Whor
- Recommended by: Jason Lemkin, who called it “good & 100% accurate.”
- Key takeaway: Whor’s model is that institutional investors read companies through momentum: weak momentum suggests a dying company, strong momentum invites doubling down, and their view can change within a single update once the numbers change. He contrasts that with angels and operators, who are more likely to help with the grind, and ends with transparency as the essential trust mechanism.
- Why it matters: For founders, the practical lesson is not to hide a cold period or optimize for a perfect narrative. Keep doing the work that changes the numbers, communicate transparently, and preserve the relationships that can help during a difficult raise.
The supplied bundle does not include Packy McCormick's linking post, so the link itself and his framing cannot be verified from this source material. The supplied essay is the Construction Physics piece titled "What's Happening to Wholesale Electricity Prices?" (bundle metadata; URL construction-physics.com/p/whats-happening-to-wholesale-electricity), and it carries no author byline in the numbered lines — the only attribution-adjacent line is "All errors are my own" after thanks to James Hewett ().
Findings:
- The essay's stated purpose is to determine why electricity prices are increasing so much and so quickly, and it looks at wholesale LMP trends rather than consumer rates ().
- Broad trend: wholesale prices were flat or declining through 2020, then rose enormously by 2x-4x across every hub in 2021-2023; by 2024 they had come down, then rose again in 2025; wholesale electricity costs have nearly doubled on average since 2020 ().
- Direct comparative signal for PJM vs ERCOT: "ISONE, MISO, PJM, and NYISO have all seen huge wholesale electricity price increases in 2025 compared to 2024 (40-80% increases year over year). Even ERCOT has seen prices rise 15-20% compared to 2024" ().
- The essay's core explanatory thesis is that wholesale prices have risen substantially since 2020 — faster than consumer prices — and that in most places transmission capacity is an increasing bottleneck: "we're having a harder and harder time accessing the least expensive power" (). For PJM specifically, congestion spreads became much more volatile starting around 2021, with hubs like Dayton and Chicago Gen skewing negative ("trapped" power) and the Dominion hub skewing positive ().
- Caveat/gap: There is no explicit statement in the source that PJM wholesale electricity is more expensive than ERCOT, and no dedicated PJM-vs-ERCOT explanation; the closest evidence is the comparative year-over-year increase in L79. ERCOT is also excluded from the congestion analysis because it does not break LMP down into congestion ().
Patrick Collison (Stripe CEO) made these authentic content recommendations in a ZOË 2026 interview on aesthetics:
- John Ruskin, The Nature of Gothic — called it "the best thing I've read this year," crediting Ruskin with strongly believing in the connection between aesthetics and the good life.
- Solzhenitsyn's Nobel Prize acceptance speech — said he was "very moved" by its line on the "ancient triad" of beauty, goodness, and truth, and by the argument that beauty bears within it its own verification.
- Beauty (author's name not recalled in the source) — described as a "great book" marshaling evidence that most people agree on what is beautiful, though experts tend to prefer disharmony and the more complicated or challenging.
YC CEO Garry Tan cited an old Derek Civers TED talk (source spelling) to illustrate why co-founders matter: one person dancing alone in a field looks like a crazy person, but the second person joining turns it into a movement ("suddenly 10 people are there dancing then it's a party") . No link or exact title was provided.
Packy McCormick (Not Boring) points readers to Brian Potter's Construction Physics article, "What's Happening to Wholesale Electricity" (https://www.construction-physics.com/p/whats-happening-to-wholesale-electricity), as the explanation for why PJM and other wholesale electricity markets have gotten relatively more expensive compared to ERCOT . The recommendation appears in the context of Base Power's Illinois expansion, where ComEd's all-in residential rate has jumped to 17.07¢/kWh, up roughly 90% from ~9¢/kWh in 2021 .
@jasonlk endorsed @keithwhor's thread on investor updates as "good & 100% accurate" and shared the link to it (https://x.com/keithwhor/status/2087646493050282380). The recommended thread argues institutional investors operate entirely on momentum — low momentum reads as a dying company, strong momentum invites doubling down — and their opinion can swing within a single update, so bad updates are mostly irrelevant; they update their priors immediately once you put up numbers . Angel investors and operators run on a different wavelength, like the grind-y work, and will help; transparency is king because every company hits a cold spot or tough raise and needs friends .
Brad Gerstner (@altcap), founder of Altimeter, endorsed @_clarktang's X thread as "Important framing" and shared the link . The thread — https://x.com/_clarktang/status/2087498604147560937 — argues Nvidia is "speedrunning the creation of a synthetic hyperscaler" : it assembled the operational half (DSX OS, Mission Control, DSX reference designs, Dynamo inference serving) and the financing half (revenue-share/credit-support model bringing $500B of third-party capital to the table) of a hyperscaler, and it rebuts fears around circularity, asset underwritability, and market share .