We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
The clearest new reading lead: Shane Parrish’s *Clear Thinking*
1 day ago
•
2 min read
•
124 docs
A tightly filtered set of organic learning leads centered on Jonathan Fields’s explicit endorsement of Shane Parrish’s *Clear Thinking*, with two more specific contextual recommendations on status, priorities, and memorable startup naming.
Standout recommendation
Clear Thinking — book
- Creator: Shane Parrish, identified in the conversation as the founder of Farnam Street and the author of Clear Thinking.
- Link:Interview in which the recommendation appears
- Recommended by: Jonathan Fields, who says he would “definitely encourage people to dive much deeper into that in the book,” calling it “really powerful and practical and valuable.”
- Key takeaway: The endorsement is tied to a practical decision method: write down a decision at night, revisit it in the morning, and use that second perspective to expose missing information or blind spots.
- Why it matters: This is the strongest lead because it is an unambiguous recommendation connected to a usable safeguard, rather than a bare “must-read” mention.
Two contextual reading leads
Charles Dickens’s Scrooge book — book
- Title as surfaced: The transcript identifies it as a book featuring Ebenezer Scrooge, but does not state the formal title. Creator: Charles Dickens.
- Link:Interview in which the recommendation appears
- Recommended by: Shane Parrish, who calls it a “great book” while discussing independent thinking and the danger of adopting someone else’s scoreboard.
- Key takeaway: Scrooge illustrates the person who pursues society’s markers—money, power, respect, and being well-known—only to want a “doover” at the end.
- Why it matters: Parrish connects the story to the question “what’s worth wanting?” and to periodically reassessing whether one’s priorities are genuinely one’s own.
How I Built This episode featuring the YETI founders — podcast
- Creator/host: Not named in the surfaced recommendation; the posts identify the program and its YETI-founder guests.
- Link:Original discussion
- Recommended by: Sarah Tavel, through a softer but specific endorsement: she says she “love[s]” the episode’s two-week follow-up asking which name people remembered, after the original post highlighted the episode’s naming lesson.
- Key takeaway: Do not choose the least-common-denominator name everyone likes; choose one that does the job it was given and cannot be forgotten.
- Why it matters: It gives founders a concrete naming test—optimize for distinctiveness and function, then see what sticks, rather than for universal immediate approval.